To call the Daytona 200 anything less than a disappointment might be fighting words in some circles of motorcycle race fans, and at best the race was a dismal start to the 2011 AMA Pro Road Racing series. From that day’s events, speculation and criticism have surrounded the Daytona 200, its multiple red flags, shortened race distance, and other events that unfolded over the course of its running.

Looking to address those criticisms, AMA Pro Racing has issued a lengthy reply and explanation of how the events unfolded behind the scenes, both in regards to stopping the race for a tire change and regarding repairs to Jason DiSalvo’s motor. AMA race fans hold on tight, because is about as close as you’re going to get to an apology from AMA Pro Racing.

The opening round of the 2011 AMA Pro Road Racing season featured some of the most intense, unforgettable action the series has seen yet. It also featured difficult decisions, outright failures, and confusion and dismay among fans and participants, out of respect for whom AMA Pro Racing pens this lengthy release. The decisions made last weekend will be explained here in detail; the failures that occurred will be acknowledged and addressed.

As is common knowledge at this point, AMA Pro Racing’s spec-tire partner, Dunlop, saw evidence of front-tire overheating in the aftermath of many Daytona 200 riders’ first pit stops. Once a conclusion was reached, they immediately notified AMA Pro officials that in the interests of rider safety, the Daytona 200 would need to be stopped long enough to allow all participating riders to mount a fresh front tire, and the red flag was thrown within ten seconds of that communication. The length of the downtime that followed has led to significant speculation about several aspects of the day’s events; the actual facts are detailed below.

Additional background: Initially, Dunlop advised AMA Pro that riders would need to swap their current fronts for fresh versions of the same tire before continuing the 200, and the paddock was instructed to do so. Once riders were pitted under the red flag, however, Dunlop reassessed the situation and decided, again in the interests of safety, that all riders would need to be fitted with entirely new-spec backup fronts then stored in Dunlop’s garages. The execution of both Dunlop decisions were complicated (and lengthened) by the fact that many teams had neither extra fronts (relating to the first set of instructions), nor extra rims.

LENGTH OF THE RED-FLAG HOLD: The length of the downtime that followed the first red flag was wholly and solely dictated by the amount of time it took to get each of the thirty-eight Daytona 200 competitors re-fitted with new-spec tires that were warmed long enough to be safely raced on. The downtime included the paddock’s attempts to comply with original instructions, the communication to the paddock of Dunlop’s revised assessment, the process of getting the entire field’s front rims re-fitted with new-spec rubber, and the time it took to safely warm new tires.

Dunlop’s new-spec re-fitment process was non-stop. During this period, AMA Pro re-set the Daytona 200 re-start time several times based on communication with Dunlop about their progress. LTD Racing’s Huntley Nash was the last rider in the class to receive a new tire, and in consultation with Nash’s crew chief, Gary Medley, it was decided that 20 minutes was the minimum amount of time his tire needed to warm. The 3-minute board for the race’s re-start was set for 20 minutes from that time.

TEAM LATUS RACING/JASON DISALVO: Because Team Latus Racing used the significant red-flag downtime to repair eventual race-winner Jason DiSalvo’s Ducati machine, speculation has given rise to two rumors that will be addressed here: 1) That the red-flag hold was extended to give Latus time to re-enter the race; 2) That the Latus machine was out of AMA Pro’s control at points during said downtime.

1) The most straightforward response to Item 1 can be found in the above paragraphs detailing how the red flag and restart occurred and were handled. In short, the length of the red flag was solely dictated by the time it took to safely address the tire problem. To that fact, AMA Pro would simply add that we are fiercely dedicated to treating all of our participating teams and manufacturers equally and fairly, and further, that the matter of our dwindling live TV time—- the importance of putting our series in front of a live, prime-time audience—- was also of great importance. There was no benefit to AMA Pro in a red track; only in a green one.

2) Once pitted, Latus staff asked AMA Pro officials the approximate length of the red flag. As the extent of the tire problem was not clear at that point, they were told 10 minutes. AMA Pro grid official Mike Lagenfeld asked the Latus team to move DiSalvo’s machine from pit lane to behind the wall, as it was deemed to be in an unsafe position for the then-impending restart. From that point on, the Latus machine was at no time out of Mr. Lagenfeld’s sight; Lagenfeld also periodically monitored both team and machine for 3- to 5-minute intervals. When Lagenfeld informed the Latus team that the delay would be a lengthy one, they requested clarity on the rules and were told that as long as the original frame was used, the rules permitted them to regrid. With an AMA Pro staff member on-site the entire time, Latus made all necessary repairs and were gridded and inspected by tech staff, who also confirmed that proper procedure for removal from pit lane and AMA Pro custody had been followed.

Related rules: 2011 AMA Pro Road Racing Rule Book, pages 25 (2.23.c.iii) and 27 (2.23.h).

TIMING & SCORING: AMA Pro Racing deeply regrets that some of our online Timing & Scoring operations were not representative of AMA Pro standards last weekend, and that our at-track operations briefly listed an incorrect finishing order for the Daytona 200 itself. This—- and the effect it had on our competitors and fans—- is entirely unacceptable to AMA Pro, and internal measures will be taken to ensure future rounds are unmarred by repeats of such.

Due to the last-lap red flag triggered by Dane Westby’s and Taylor Knapp’s crashes, an incident in which Josh Herrin was also involved, some confusion exists about how Daytona 200 finishers were scored. The explanation, as per AMA Pro rules, follows: Because the first five riders crossed the finish line prior to the red flag, their race was ruled complete. Once the red flag was thrown, however, the results of those remaining riders reverted to the previous lap. The exception to this is riders involved in a red flag, if fault is not then assigned. Those riders are moved to the back of their respective lap-groups, which put Herrin behind the four who’d already crossed the line, and put Knapp and Westby behind a group that had not yet taken the checkers (but in front of everyone a lap down).

Related rules: 2011 AMA Pro Road Racing Rule Book, pages 27 (2.23q) and 28 (2.25.a and 2.25.d).

RIDER CONDUCT: AMA Pro Racing has carefully reviewed footage of the closing stages of the Daytona 200, together with other pertinent information, and has regrettably found one rider’s on-track actions to have been unacceptably dangerous to other riders. Notification and explanation of penalty will be mailed to the rider in question; once received, the details of that ruling will be shared publicly by AMA Pro.

Related rules: 2011 AMA Pro Road Racing Rule Book, page 83 (A2.3.p) (A2.3.u).

CONCLUSION OF THE 200/15-LAP SPRINT: The decision to restart and conclude the Daytona 200 as a 15-lap sprint was influenced by two factors: 1) All involved parties were entirely confident the new-spec tires could safely do 15 laps under DIS’ unique conditions; 2) Several of the teams’ and riders’ strategies involved running the entire race on a single front tire, and thus many participants were absent the back-up rims required for a pit stop tire-change. Keeping both the competitors’ and the tires’ capabilities in mind, AMA Pro officials strongly felt a 15-lap race was the only acceptable conclusion relative to rider safety.

Source: AMA Pro Racing; Photo: © 2011 Dan Lo / – All Rights Reserved

  • JR

    I’ve been watching motorcycle racing for about a decade, but almost entirely MotoGP, World Superbike and British Superbike. I’ve been vaguely aware of AMA racing, but only sporadically watched races. The organization always looked to be 1. much more amateur (cone chicanes, regional tracks, etc.), and 2. much better-funded than other series.

    With that intro to my perspective, and lack of deep knowledge of the series, I thought the Daytona 200 race was absolutely fantastic. So much action, passing, strategy, more passing, drama and craziness. Yes, I understand that there were serious issues, but as a fan of motorcycle RACING, I loved it. My wife, who hates motorcycle racing, was interested and looking over my shoulder.

    I never thought I’d say this, but honestly, you guys need to give the AMA a break.

  • Jimmy Midnight

    AMA still stands for Amateur!

    That’s why we all watch MotoGP!

  • BB

    I thought the racing was fantastic. AMA Pro need not apoligise. I would rather have my live feed interrupted and watch a shortened race than watch a rider skid into the wall at 150 mph because his Dunlop chunked.

  • Steve

    Hats off to the front runners in that 15 lap final. That was one of the most exciting races I have ever seen in over 40 years. My heart was in my throat the whole time. Outstanding! I can’t believe Herron caused that get off on purpose as has been suggested, but he is a bone head none the less. I don’t ever want to hear him whine about Eslick “bumping” him ever again. What an idiot.

    Don’t get me started abbout the AMA….there isn’t enough room here.

  • joe

    Shame it doesn’t hold the prestige it once did.

  • Ray

    5 or 10 years ago AMA roadracing was really good. I’m having trouble getting into it now.

    This Daytona 200 was surprisingly exciting though, and I commend Dunlop for what they did with the front tires.

    The motor swap seemed like BS to me though.

  • buellracerx

    Ray – the motor swap was entirely within the rules. rules clarification request by the latus guys shows integrity. hour engine swaps are no fun; props to them

    given the situation, I think AMA deserves a break on the end-of-race scoring issue.

    quickly losing respect for Herrin…

  • I do believe that the AMA wants to wants to do a good job, just like anyone who loves what they do. At least I want to believe that they love what they do.

    The root of the Daytona conundrum is the venue itself. The time for a 200 mile race which incorporates NASCAR high banking and concrete walls has come and gone. The AMA cannot blame Dunlop for tire issues. They must hold themselves accountable for continuing to hold an endurance race on a track which is not safe for distance racing on sticky street tires. Let’s face it. Daytona does not hold the international prestige it did just a decade ago. The AMA killed that when they decided not to work with the FIM on creating a date for the race which would allow WSBK riders to participate. Continue sprint races at Daytona if you must, but it’s time for a premier 200 mile race at a safer track which doesn’t place ridiculous demands on DOT tires. Hell, a different track might even allow them to race actual Superbikes on true race tires for 200 miles.

    My two cents: Create the Utah 200 and hold it at Miller the same weekend or within a week of the WSBK event, and open up the rules to include FIM spec Superbikes (and fuel, tires, etc.) for that race only. Award AMA series points to AMA racers based on their respective finishing order, but acknowledge the podium no matter what series they normally run. And make it worth while for the WSBK guys to race. Prestige and safety in one package.

  • I have to agree with the first poster. The 15 lap sprint at the end was unbelievable. Fantastic racing, back and forth.

    I do have a few points I’d like to share for discussion…

    1. Please god, replace Scott Russel. I know he’s Mr. Daytona and all, but he’s certainly not an effective broadcaster. Maybe he could work as a third color guy, but he’s way too prominent right now.

    2. Thank you, thank you, thank you SPEED for having that Australian dude become the main announcer, much better than the guy the last few years (not sure if he started last year, didn’t catch many AMA races)!

    3. Give some god damn tickets away or something! The stands were almost completely empty! yikes. They need to seriously reevaluate their marketing strategy, it’s not working.


  • Billy Pilgrim

    The Daytona 200 is a race that has out lived it’s use. The Superbikes were too fast and tires couldn’t be built to make racing safe, so AMA went to 600’s. Now the 600’s are too fast and once again we have tires that make racing at Daytona unsafe. What’s next, restrictor plates?

  • TV coverage does have schedules, but live tv can be spontaneous too if there are unique events unfolding. Filming Team Latus Racing repairing the motor would have been more entertaining than the truck qualifying that was aired. In addition, it would have helped avoid rumors. This was a rare sub plot within an unfortunate (and rare) extended red flag stoppage in which Speed Channel could have discussed the rules book while filming the motor being repaired. I have to believe that would have entertained even the truck fans…..then the sprint.

  • Bill Smith

    We’re all missing two critical points:

    1. The delay for attending spectators was nothing short of unacceptable. Those of us watching The Speed Channel could simply DVR the race. I’ll assume most of the local spectators simply left the race.
    2. Is there quality control in AMA??? Why wasn’t this tire issue detected before the start of the race? One can only assume there is no real tire testing in AMA based on the results of this opening event. Just another example of a very immature and incompetent race league – AMA road racing has a very limited shelf-life!

  • buellracerx

    Bill, I think both of your questions would be best asked of dunlop. not AMA. AMA does not have control over the compounds. I agree with you that it was unacceptable, but place responsibility where it is due – with dunlop.

    Perhaps you would rather AMA force racers to run on unsafe tires for your own viewing pleasure?

  • irksome

    I have to agree that the 200 has run its course. Its length, speeds, tire pressures, pit stops (?!?) and engine demands have no bearing on the rest of the season. Once they substituted 600s for Superbikes as the premier class, it became irrelevant.

    I attended for several years as a photographer in the ’90s; still steamed over having the entire event postponed a day on account of rain. That said, there was nothing like watching Anthony Gobert sliding the front and the rear end into the chicane or DuHamel visibly laughing while painting rubber stripes out of the horseshoe during practice. Effing brilliant.