Comments on: Ezpeleta on 1000cc Engine Switch in MotoGP: “Production Engines” Won’t be in the Rule Book

By: Roscoe Ryon

Roscoe Ryon — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:19:09 +0000

Can you accept guest posts? We would like to write a couple articles here.

By: Dakota Cheves

Dakota Cheves — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:36:00 +0000

Hi, possibly this post may be off topic but anyways, I’ve been browsing about your website and it looks very awesome. It’s obvious that you know the topic and you appear passionate about it. We are developing a fresh weblog plus I am attempting to make it look great, and provide high quality material. Having learned a good deal from this site plus I look forward to further articles and will be returning soon. Many thanks.

By: Gordon Bengston

Gordon Bengston — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:05:27 +0000

Ezpeleta on 1000cc Engine Switch in MotoGP: “Production Engines …: Dec 8, 2009 … There's be some trouble brew… http://bit.ly/6fYbtl

By: road_rage

road_rage — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:03:46 +0000

Common sense is that if MotoGP has an engine that is a close relative of what I can buy downtown, then what’s the point of WSBK? I get that the frame is prototype, but I can imagine the manufacturers slipping in pics of MotoGP and hinting at the pedigree of the 20XX model even if they are not allowed. FIM is really the manufacturers bitch. I don’t think COI translates in Swiss (Jensen, do you know?)

The only feedback Flammini should give is his refusal to face the wall and grab his ankles for Carmelo.If this goes through, Flammini should be seeking payback from Dorna/FIM the Shawshank way.

FIM/DORNA/SBK/(Maybe should now add TTXGP). Same old shit, different day.

By: Bjorn

Bjorn — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:44:35 +0000

I look forward to Friday.
If this plays out as suggested, it will be a victory for common sense and encourage a broader spread of competitors. Allowing production based engines into the mix will encourage private (well financed) tuners to hack existing designs.
Forward to the Future!